Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 19:53:28 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> To: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@freebsd.org> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Call for help: moving manpages to share/man Message-ID: <CALH631mTLUzSYEUr-sPfN_U%2By6-afFrsSrcJazazuQJqowTUOw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <037984e5-d7de-4ea5-91ab-a4d90a7bb004@gwdg.de> References: <CALH631=312%2Bz8-1Gr32gZL_X3QduNCiMEyM3ZOwvqmAh6eRW7A@mail.gmail.com> <037984e5-d7de-4ea5-91ab-a4d90a7bb004@gwdg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 7:45=E2=80=AFPM Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> wr= ote: > > All three ports do not generate any man pages. So I don't understand why > they are included in the list. Or is it different if autotools is used? > > Thanks in advance for any clarification. Moin generated this list while working on the same problem for python ports, so this list also contains these. You can just ignore them for now. The ports I'm interested in should have GNU_CONFIGURE=3Dyes knob
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631mTLUzSYEUr-sPfN_U%2By6-afFrsSrcJazazuQJqowTUOw>