From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 23 18:58:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A150616A6AB for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 18:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mallman@icir.org) Received: from wyvern.icir.org (wyvern.icir.org [192.150.187.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFCF43D45 for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 18:58:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mallman@icir.org) Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4NIwFs5041465; Tue, 23 May 2006 11:58:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mallman@icir.org) Received: from lawyers.icir.org (guns.icir.org [69.222.35.58]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3224377AC21; Tue, 23 May 2006 14:58:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0229416D24; Tue, 23 May 2006 14:57:15 -0400 (EDT) To: mag@intron.ac From: Mark Allman In-Reply-To: Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR) Song-of-the-Day: Bad to the Bone MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_bOundary"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:57:15 -0400 Sender: mallman@icir.org Message-Id: <20060523185715.E0229416D24@lawyers.icir.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Marcin Jessa Subject: Re: How to Quicken TCP Re-transmission? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mallman@icir.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 18:58:16 -0000 --=_bOundary Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline > Thank you for your reminder. Actually, I understand you and > RFC 2018. What I really concern is how wide support (and being enabled > by default) SACK has obtained. For we do not always transfer data > between hosts running FreeBSD and maintained by network expert. SACK is quite widely deployed. See: Alberto Medina, Mark Allman, Sally Floyd. Measuring the Evolution of Transport Protocols in the Internet. ACM Computer Communication Review, 35(2), April 2005. http://www.icir.org/mallman/papers/tcp-evo-ccr05.ps allman --=_bOundary Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEc1sLWyrrWs4yIs4RAkmsAKCXlaMvQ7/gS00emF9DBd/oSIFYTACfYG7a Sl065NkDOWHWAVHUlTIUuJ4= =100R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_bOundary--