From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Jun 21 07:48:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AF8AC56DE for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:48:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E29D62BA0; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECA931FE023; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:48:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Enabling OFED by default. To: Matthew Macy References: <20160211205358.GA3567@brick.home> <56D811B3.6090406@selasky.org> <20160305155620.GB2512@brick.home> <56DC00EA.7050900@selasky.org> <20160523102055.GA2891@brick> <1556f5196ad.cc101c73136103.7671428586181101222@nextbsd.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=c5=82a?= , Oded Shanoon , Meny Yossefi , "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <36219e68-a6cd-de7c-f318-b6a65543a087@selasky.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:51:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1556f5196ad.cc101c73136103.7671428586181101222@nextbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:48:17 -0000 On 06/20/16 21:37, Matthew Macy wrote: > Sorry, this got sorted in to spam. > > Do not enable in tree linuxkpi by default. It will definitely interfere with out of tree graphics work, which would harm far far more users than it benefits. > > If anything GENERIC needs to be getting smaller. Please do not do this. It is an all around bad idea. > > -M The final goal should be to make the DRM2 LinuxKPI an extension of the kernel's LinuxKPI so that they can co-exist. --HPS