From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Fri Jun 1 10:45:52 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0951EFB6E0 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B68F73C39 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w51AjjeN001694 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:45:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: bu7cher@yandex.ru Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w51AjfCD047064; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 17:45:41 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: PRs are being closed for bogus reasons :-( To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" , Warner Losh , Dieter BSD References: <73c8fa31-ef34-5857-e702-6d8093982f9c@yandex.ru> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5B1123D5.6060307@grosbein.net> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 17:45:41 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <73c8fa31-ef34-5857-e702-6d8093982f9c@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, LOCAL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * 3.1 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: date * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 1.9 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hz.grosbein.net X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: ***** X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 10:45:52 -0000 On 01.06.2018 16:16, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 01.06.2018 00:07, Warner Losh wrote: >> So, is this idea? Nope. However, it's clear that the project doesn't have >> the resources to re-validate bugs as still being a bug, at least given the >> volume of bugs in our bug database. This is not a terrible "second best" >> idea that should help the signal / noise ratio of the PR database, which >> makes it more valuable to developers and others that might fancy fixing a >> bug. > > The one thing that I like in GNATS and lack now, it sends weekly reports > with list of assigned bugs. This was handy. Each committer and also a > project mailing list got such list every week. And this was a good > reminder to take a look to open bugs, to fixed and not yet closed bugs, etc. +1 Can we get weekly notifications back?