Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 21:51:45 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no ports work anymore Message-ID: <20000327215144.E69223@lovett.com> In-Reply-To: <20000327213207.E23367@jade.chc-chimes.com>; from billf@chc-chimes.com on Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 09:32:07PM -0500 References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003271559010.32595-100000@Gloria.CAM.ORG> <20000327235956.E233@parish> <38DFF040.3CD7CD92@cam.org> <20000327213207.E23367@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[cc's trimmed appropriately] On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 09:32:07PM -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > PORTS ARE NOT BRANCHED. > > There is no RELENG_3 of ports-base. There is a RELENG_3_0_RELEASE > or however > the hell they're tagged > (http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi or `cvs log' for > the answer). > > You are asking cvsup for something that does not exist. Hmm.. I wonder if it would be possible for the cvsup server to maintain a list of "allowed tags" for each collection it makes available, with no file (or an empty one) meaning "any tag you want" We could then have the server return "Hey, here's a gun, and a bullet" for bad tags for the ports-* case (only *_RELEASE and '.'), and simply stop, rather than (quite correctly) emptying an entire magazine into the hapless users ports tree.. And before anyone shouts "patches accepted", I have to state that I have absolutely no idea how to code this in "NotC", and Modula-anything sends shivers down my spine :) -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000327215144.E69223>