From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun May  5 01:36:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA26390
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 5 May 1996 01:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA26366
          for <FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 5 May 1996 01:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA01100; Sun, 5 May 1996 01:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@unety.net>
cc: "'Darren Reed'" <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>,
        "FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org" <FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: IPv8 Tutorial #1: Minimal IPv8 hack 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 May 1996 01:56:28 CDT."
             <01BB3A26.1428B140@webster.unety.net> 
Date: Sun, 05 May 1996 01:35:32 -0700
Message-ID: <1098.831285332@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Can I call a time-out on the IPv8 discussion in -hackers, please?
It's a very specialized topic and of very _narrow_ interest to most
FreeBSD hackers, who will still be using IPv4 for the forseeable
future (and no debate on the desirability of that, please!)

I'm sure that this can be taken to private email with little or no
degradation in the quality of the discussion, and certainly far fewer
people screaming "aigh!  shut up about IPv8 already, we beg of you!"

					Jordan