From owner-freebsd-small Tue Nov 7 14:14: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from c014.sfo.cp.net (c014-h003.c014.sfo.cp.net [209.228.12.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7002837B4CF for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (cpmta 744 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2000 14:13:59 -0800 Received: from nohost080.encommerce.com (HELO wscatoneil.flashcom.net) (166.90.168.80) by smtp.flashcom.net (209.228.12.67) with SMTP; 7 Nov 2000 14:13:59 -0800 X-Sent: 7 Nov 2000 22:13:59 GMT Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001107140919.00e0eef0@mail.flashcom.net> X-Sender: bwana@mail.flashcom.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 14:16:49 -0800 To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org From: Tim O'Neil Subject: Re: In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20001101093158.00a70dc0@mx1> References: <611C3E2A972ED41196EF0050DA92E07608F9B2@EXCHANGE2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 01:32 AM 11/1/00, you wrote: >Is it *REALLY* all that hard to read the last two lines appended to every >message that goes through this list? I think it really is. Every mail list I subscribe to gets about two to four commands sent to the list rather than the list server each day. Granted, not all of them have precise commands on how to un-subscribe from said list, but I have to wonder; if they can't figure out how to un-subscribe, how did they subscribe in the first place? Must be the buckshot approach to Murphy's Law or summat... -Tim =========================== Geek Code, v.7.777: +++0+++; Shoutout to fil, kreet0n, & Beth, the chicken is in the pot, repeat, the chicken is in the pot... rinse, repeat. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message