From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jun 19 15:18:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6961737B74D for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:18:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e5JMIA720759; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:18:10 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Jonathan Lemon , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kblob discussion. Message-ID: <20000619151809.C17420@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000619125345.H26801@fw.wintelcom.net> <3249.961452627@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3249.961452627@localhost>; from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com on Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 03:10:27PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jordan K. Hubbard [000619 15:10] wrote: > > It doesn't bother you at all that cdrom.com can push 100mbit > > and support 6000 users on FreeBSD but Joe Average FreeBSD User > > can't because the hacks used aren't available? > > Huh? What makes you think that cdrom.com uses "special hacks" to get > its performance? Have you actually talked to David Greenman about > this lately? I'm quite sure cdrom.com has at least a kernel address space hack. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message