Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:30:52 +1100 (EST)
From:      callum.gibson@db.com
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Cc:        eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com
Subject:   Re: pthread_sigmask problem
Message-ID:  <20020205043052.75887.qmail@merton.aus.deuba.com>
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "callum" at Feb 05, 2002 03:02:08 PM

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
callum writes:
}handlers to be installed for them. Hmm, it's a lot more verbose calling
}sigaction for every signal rather than a single pthread_sigmask call.
}I guess that's why we have for loops.

Doh! You can specify a set of signals with sigaction. Sorry about that.

    C

(c)2002 Callum Gibson                       callum.gibson@db.com
Global Markets IT, Deutsche Bank, Australia       61 2 9258 1620
### The opinions in this message are mine and not Deutsche's ###

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020205043052.75887.qmail>