Date: Wed, 1 Nov 1995 10:33:09 +0900 From: Toshihiro Kanda <candy@fct.kgc.co.jp> To: girgen@e.kth.se (Palle Girgensohn) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AppleTalk for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <199511010133.KAA06860@xxx.fct.kgc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <v02130500acbbebb44fbb@[194.52.86.106]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
We are running CAP 6.0 pl 196 with native EtherTalk phase 2 as an appleshare server. It works like a champ. Note you need to config the kernel 16 or *lessor* bpf's or you'll get panic. $ uname -rms FreeBSD 2.0.5-RELEASE i386 > Is anybody using one of the free Unix AppleTalk packages, CAP or NetATalk, > on FreeBSD _without_ additional routing hardware? > > As far as I can comprehend from different FAQ's and postings, NetATalk is > not YET available for FreeBSD, but people are working on it. As of CAP, it > seems to be up and running for some people, but is not free from problems > AND (this is the bad part:) requires a hardware(?) router (i.e. GatorBox > etc...) to pack the EtherTalk packets into TCP/IP packets, or else it only > runs the old "chatty" EtherTalk phase I. > > Am I right? (Hope not!!!) > > If I am right: > > * Is there a problem (apart from descreased bandwidth) using EtherTalk phase I? > > * Is anybody using an NFS-client for the Mac to connect to FreeBSD? Which client > softwares are good and which ones aren't? candy@fct.kgc.co.jp (Toshihiro Kanda)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511010133.KAA06860>