From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 4 14:35:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C60106566B for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from cp65.agava.net (cp65.agava.net [89.108.66.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3338FC1C for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=hive.panopticon) by cp65.agava.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JWYHw-000JOd-HE; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:38:40 +0300 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32]) by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547888FC1; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:34:38 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9848917023; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:35:04 +0300 (MSK) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:35:04 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080304143504.GA80010@hades.panopticon> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, linimon@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp65.agava.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - amdmi3.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: linimon@freebsd.org Subject: why are older ports built on Sparc64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:35:01 -0000 Hi! As far as I know, we don't have enough sparc64 horsepower on the build cluster. But still it seems like old ports are build again and again there (and fail), though new versions have fixes. For example, I have two ports failing on sparc64 for which I've submitted fixes: http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=blobandconquer and http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=sharpconstruct Both ports were updated on Jan 03 with patches that will (hopefully) fix them on sparc64 with with PORTREVISIONs bumped, still portsmon shows builds failed on Feb 25, and those are old versions of ports. Seems strange to me. -- Dmitry A. Marakasov | jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru amdmi3@amdmi3.ru | http://www.amdmi3.ru