From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Apr 1 10:44:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from carme.eclipse.net.uk (carme.eclipse.net.uk [195.188.32.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8CA15183 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 10:44:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stuart@eclipse.net.uk) Received: from eclipse.net.uk (elara.eclipse.net.uk [195.188.32.31]) by carme.eclipse.net.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA81944; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 19:42:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3703BE9D.B1F6E13F@eclipse.net.uk> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 19:44:45 +0100 From: Stuart Henderson Organization: Eclipse Networking Limited X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Busarow Cc: Leif Neland , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Happy98 blocker, was Re: sendmail melissa blocker References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Check out > http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/procmail-security.html Any idea what kind of overhead procmail would have on mail delivery on a system processing ~10k messages / day, and can it be used in the path of messages being relayed or is it just for local delivery? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message