From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 17 4:47:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freenix.no (atreides.freenix.no [217.68.117.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC7837B424 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 04:47:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from morten@freenix.no) Received: (from morten@localhost) by freenix.no (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f3HBlIn92233 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:47:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from morten) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:47:18 +0200 From: "Morten A . Middelthon" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Weird ipnat(?) behaviour Message-ID: <20010417134718.C90225@freenix.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE X-Warning: So cunning you could brush your teeth with it. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've got a 4.1.1-STABLE box running ipf/ipnat for my local networks. /etc/ipnat.conf: map fxp0 10.0.0.0/16 -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 When two or more boxes behind my ipnat-box try pinging the same host on the outside only one of them can ping it at a time. Pinging different boxes on the outside works fine. I start pinging an outside-box on two local boxes simultaneously and only one of them gets responses. As soon as I stop pinging on the box which receives responses the other one continues, but then with a packet loss, ofcourse. Any good explanation for this? -- Morten A. Middelthon Freenix Norge http://www.freenix.no/ -- Algoreithm (n: al-gore-ith-m): Any method of calculation performed repeatedly until a prior desired result is produced. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message