From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 11 17:53:35 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA13782 for current-outgoing; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 17:53:35 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA13768 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 17:53:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA00326 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 17:53:30 -0700 To: current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Sound code: Anyone for -current code in 2.1? Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 17:53:30 -0700 Message-ID: <324.810867210@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Well, I've proven to my satisfaction that the GUS MAX doesn't really work correctly in 2.1-STABLE (at least not with `maplay', at it's documented as broken in 2.1's LINT) so I just need to know whether or not all the soundblaster et al users out there are happier with the -current sound code, or the 2.1-STABLE stuff. If it's 2.1-STABLE then I'll bow to the needs of the many and take a broken GUS MAX for the time being. If it's 2.2, then I'll do the work to integrate it into 2.1. You folks decide. Feedback please? Jordan