From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 23:58:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F5AF5994 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 23:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (mx.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-digest SHA384) (Client CN "mail.allbsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dJ7F4Jl4z4BPB; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:58:65ff:fe00:b0b]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x8ONwFAD036936 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) (Client CN "/CN=mail-d.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=Let's+20Encrypt/CN=Let's+20Encrypt+20Authority+20X3"); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:58:26 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=allbsd.org; s=20190220; t=1569369516; bh=gve9tqPR9gJykbYcqZXpTG7Nches2ohXuojuDg3C/uU=; h=Date:To:Cc:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=KKT6LB6y2VWqEqyNl5Kz/JqWJ951A/qdE+unCpONUUXXbsTf2/gOnTuQJcCgzsbVe NKudOcPqwp5m+MopwurgrU5c0TpgYChlpzJtE6sll7PJhxf9hJv4qTzG3PAdv7FUS1 tU6bXrMxWIuZ07wpTRbHKFj/K9+WF3CWS7yB8FbI= Received: from alph.d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8ONwAdD012189 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:58:10 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id x8ONw9or012186; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:58:10 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:57:53 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> To: luthramihir708@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_25_08_57_53_2019_551)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001:0:0:0:41]); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:58:36 +0900 (JST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dJ7F4Jl4z4BPB X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=allbsd.org header.s=20190220 header.b=KKT6LB6y; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hrs@allbsd.org designates 2001:2f0:104:e001::41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hrs@allbsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[allbsd.org:s=20190220]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[allbsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[allbsd.org:+]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7514, ipnet:2001:2f0::/32, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.21)[ip: (-9.10), ipnet: 2001:2f0::/32(-4.23), asn: 7514(2.30), country: JP(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 23:58:54 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_25_08_57_53_2019_551)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mihir Luthra wrote in : lu> Hi everyone, lu> lu> Just as mentioned in [1], rpc.statd is not ipv6 clean. lu> lu> Although I have been through the code, and didn't found any issues until lu> now. The code conditionally checks for ipv6/ipv4 everywhere and uses ipv6 lu> compatible functions. lu> lu> As per one old commit [2], seems rpc.statd was already made to function lu> correctly with ipv6. lu> lu> I searched bugzilla(thinking someone may have reported something similar, lu> giving rise to the project), but didn't see anything similar for rpc.statd lu> and ipv6 support. lu> lu> I wanted to ask if someone could share the issues they encountered while lu> using rpc.statd with ipv6? I think the project page has wrong information regarding rpc.statd. Although it is not clean from the viewpoint of transport independent, it works with IPv6. There are more userland utilities which do not support IPv6---rwhod, yp*, etc. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_25_08_57_53_2019_551)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMkEABMKAC0WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXYqtgQ8caHJzQGFsbGJz ZC5vcmcACgkQ27B9xm8fc39aRwIJARHvh7TElUGHz+jvjQwH2wmHN6RpSDunsFt5 5TtYomI7y0qzSB2jTV7BoviUOJ4LcTgkJN9Wo1Pf9xvPQ10O3H19AgkBOxIPbrRr 1t5nwCvSQoRA4ZaI+kuz4VGgAiWzP1jVKoCGOffm8GWvk4ObYcSPplDzjDGzecGk ETacoKZ39jC7HGs= =tN6+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_25_08_57_53_2019_551)----