From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 05:42:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6F716A4B3 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 05:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns2.foolishgames.net (ns2.foolishgames.net [216.93.162.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F1643FE1 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 05:42:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) Received: from foolishgames.com (adsl-64-109-110-183.dsl.gdrpmi.ameritech.net [64.109.110.183]) (authenticated bits=0)h92CgsfV079880; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 05:42:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:42:48 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) To: Todd Stephens From: Lucas Holt In-Reply-To: <200310012323.37963.tbstep@tampabay.rr.com> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. RedHat X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 12:42:56 -0000 > Let me give acknowledgment to Greg Lehey ahead of time for this as this > bit that follows comes from _The Complete FreeBSD_. > > ".. by the mid-80s, there were four different versions of UNIX: the > Research Version ... the Berkeley Software Distribution ... System V > ... and XENIX, " > > Sorry for omitting parts, but the overall idea of the passage remains > intact. > > I believe, and someone correct me here, that BSD was a modification of > the /original/ UNIX code which existed prior to Sys V in 1983, > indicating that BSD and Sys V are different branches from the same > trunk. The history is rather confusing though, so I expect to be wrong > on this. > > -- > Todd Stephens > You are right through the 80s. In the 90s, the System V code had to be pulled from most of the kernel. The NetBSD and FreeBSD projects started with the BSD 386 code, and had to redo their distro as a result of a lawsuit to the BSD 4.4 lite code. That code had several files removed as part of the lawsuit settlement. I'd guess that only SCO products, Solaris, AIX, and (if you believe SCO) Linux 2.4 has System V code in them now. Of course I mean solaris 2.x+, since 1.x was based on BSD code. Lucas Holt Luke@FoolishGames.com ________________________________________________________ FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) JustJournal.com (Free blogging) "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)