From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 23 16:28:50 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6B5D316A4CE; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:28:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from athena.softcardsystems.com (mail.softcardsystems.com
	[12.34.136.114])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E2C8C43D53; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:28:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sah@softcardsystems.com)
Received: from athena (athena [12.34.136.114])iBNHN5fX030259;
	Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:23:05 -0500
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:23:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam <sah@softcardsystems.com>
X-X-Sender: sah@athena
To: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20041223133440.GC786@myrddin.originative.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412231147450.30025@athena>
References: <20041223112731.GA32750@ninja.terrabionic.com>
	<20041223133440.GC786@myrddin.originative.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
cc: Daniel Blendea <bdaniel7@gmail.com>
cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org
cc: jsha <johann@terrabionic.com>
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD's Visual Identity: Outdated?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:28:50 -0000

> If we want to be taken seriously in the commercial world then we
> need to have the right image.

Look ma, a strawman!

The concern you're addressing is the sort of thing distros
solved in the Linux world.  Each typically has their own
"image," installer, system config style, etc.  More importantly
for the "commercial world," though, they offer support and
certification.

The image alone just isn't the problem.  Or a problem at all,
I'd argue.  Let's be honest -- if a ten-year-old made Beastie,
then a mentally challenged 3-year-old made Tux (and large
portions of the kernel, but I digress).

Point being Johann, if the community rejects your work
for the core project you can still make your own distro
and release it.  Give it a shot!

Cheers,

Sam