From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 25 21:53:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6414537B401; Sun, 25 May 2003 21:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A5C43F3F; Sun, 25 May 2003 21:53:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4Q4rVM7086104; Sun, 25 May 2003 21:53:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200305260453.h4Q4rVM7086104@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 21:53:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: drs@rucus.ru.ac.za, hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp In-Reply-To: <20030523071506.GA546@rucus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT cc: wpaul@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: matt@hasta.se Subject: Re: possible bug fix for 82550-based fxp packet truncation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 04:53:50 -0000 On 23 May, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Don Lewis wrote > in <200305220823.h4M8N9M7075271@gw.catspoiler.org>: > > truckman> If you are using one of my previous patches which worked around the > truckman> problem by disabling the IPCB mode, you may want to try the patch below. > > This works fine in my environment. My fxp has the following id: > > fxp0@pci7:2:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10508086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x0d hdr=0x00 > > Without any patches, packets whose size is 216+(N*1480) are dropped > as I reported on -stable before. Similarly I tried "ping -s X" with > various payload size from X=1 to X=6000 in the system using the > patched kernel, but no error is reported. > On 23 May, David Siebörger wrote: > At 10:23 AM on Thursday 22 May 2003, Don Lewis wrote: >> If you are using one of my previous patches which worked around the >> problem by disabling the IPCB mode, you may want to try the patch below. > > This patch seems to work just as well as the previous patch did on my > fxp's (card=0x00408086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x0c). Thanks for testing my patch. I committed it with re approval on Sat, 24 May 2003 22:04:26 -0700 (PDT), in time for 5.1-RELEASE.