Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:13:24 +0100 From: Simon L.Nielsen <simon@nitro.dk> To: Eric Melville <eric@FreeBSD.org> Cc: binup@FreeBSD.org, libh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: current project steps Message-ID: <20011030191359.292B337B409@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20011028133727.A15301@FreeBSD.org> References: <20011020202153.A76835@FreeBSD.org> <20011026135930.03D1637B406@hub.freebsd.org> <20011028133727.A15301@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 28 October 2001 22:37, Eric Melville wrote: > numbers should mean. I'm fond of date stamps for this reason. We could keep > supplied version numbers around for various reasons, but the actual version > would simply be the date of the latest change, like 200110281332. This > always increases forward, and will never require hacks like PORT_EPOCH. For the base system I can't see a problem with that.. except what happens if a computer changes branch e.g. STABLE -> CURRENT.. That also needs to be considered... I don't have a good solution to that right now.. Has anyone actually looked at making a packages from /usr/src and what problems there will be doing it? - -- /Simon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE73vvX8kocFXgPTRwRArQyAKDSf9wA9as70HE2HxqG8WXo6A4TSACfcIoI rEIpZbscGACjAcpvIkCy51M= =qyg7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011030191359.292B337B409>