Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:17:35 -0800 From: matt <sendtomatt@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, Norberto Lopes <nlopes.ml@gmail.com> Subject: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090 Message-ID: <4F5AC7CF.3090409@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmonu4SUVOdfbTdAnmGfQ=T-PtcAbd-PCoQ0PV_ttwF5Scw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BCYCL-d1hCzQK48EzPjgRu3UFO9EWMn-O%2B3V8%2B9cNrQE2s%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F41DDE8.6060004@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonaRy0HyaoborYg=CEbAwKGHXZooi8k5qC8781Pe7591A@mail.gmail.com> <4F48166A.5040301@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomQiwjH-nDmWJA=pg-gcgV9Djf0eCM940UvaXW_g030XQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BCYCL-6=03MvCCKq4z5aePqLPWzjAQZmHAKDXwNA8f5Gawu7A@mail.gmail.com> <4F4828C0.6020705@gmail.com> <CA%2BCYCL_o=mDA-P66nTdPR65=MwML4FghxRpNzowDE-eXNWmD6g@mail.gmail.com> <4F5A8023.1090705@gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmonu4SUVOdfbTdAnmGfQ=T-PtcAbd-PCoQ0PV_ttwF5Scw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Folks! Thanks for the patience :) Here's the patch for HEAD: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6YlMzJxarGbR1lSZ0hnTEFSREt6MU1MbGFKeURhUQ It may work on 9, but if it doesn't let me know what fails and I'll see how hard it is to backport. The patch expects to live at /usr/src, and be applied "patch -p1 < ralplus.diff" I have not tested almost anything other than connecting and browsing, so anyone that can test adhoc, hostap or anything else please let me know. Signal levels look fine. Please ignore the printfs you see at attach, I'm under the impression that they're spurious and related to certain parts of wireless N, but please let me know if you have issues with APs above channel 9. You will see an invalid eeprom low-noise amplifier gain for low-noise amplifiers you don't have. If it doesn't attach at all, send me your PCI ids and we can add them to the attach code and see if they work. My expectation is everything from rt2860-rt3090 at least will work. There are no changes to the other ral devices, but testers with other ral devices are probably necessary to be sure no regressions have occurred, especially with attach. Thanks! Matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F5AC7CF.3090409>