From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 03:17:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B357106564A; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sendtomatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5628FC08; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so1609495ghr.13 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:17:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dk+v1zqb+JqMU2LCS0Xm8Md6n5EkrJvXv5cEayjtUPE=; b=st7wKgCxFk1BRWBQOcSSZ1dBbgN9KK2QIwzxK6bSRmGre3NOnmLAILETFc1hdNolP5 UsbGBie1dkuhHZm4+iRqtwsrNiB013zVj13nz/+Tmf46jdl3e3so9JpA9yhuy3Yju9oP A4cPq3KVD1z3i5YUcJOVSSDIYQAsqCE+ZlWjD/JkejXrk9zBEpNc3IpgOiOJ1xie+D4/ 1f1kS1ybfVL8nhwjZcJq4gh9EfU6rU/FkbQy7Fj+dDoyQZkuTI38XessINYuKF0VRgJM yiyF0NR1N5A/TloOMlIvfXanrTfP/mNkykp5vj446ePv2Fj/nuNgfG2rLc02IQA7xzOp 8X4Q== Received: by 10.60.18.163 with SMTP id x3mr1591746oed.64.1331349462382; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:17:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from flatline.local (70-36-223-154.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [70.36.223.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d9sm10126360obq.0.2012.03.09.19.17.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:17:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F5AC7CF.3090409@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:17:35 -0800 From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120218 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd , freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, Norberto Lopes References: <4F41DDE8.6060004@gmail.com> <4F48166A.5040301@gmail.com> <4F4828C0.6020705@gmail.com> <4F5A8023.1090705@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:17:43 -0000 Hi Folks! Thanks for the patience :) Here's the patch for HEAD: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6YlMzJxarGbR1lSZ0hnTEFSREt6MU1MbGFKeURhUQ It may work on 9, but if it doesn't let me know what fails and I'll see how hard it is to backport. The patch expects to live at /usr/src, and be applied "patch -p1 < ralplus.diff" I have not tested almost anything other than connecting and browsing, so anyone that can test adhoc, hostap or anything else please let me know. Signal levels look fine. Please ignore the printfs you see at attach, I'm under the impression that they're spurious and related to certain parts of wireless N, but please let me know if you have issues with APs above channel 9. You will see an invalid eeprom low-noise amplifier gain for low-noise amplifiers you don't have. If it doesn't attach at all, send me your PCI ids and we can add them to the attach code and see if they work. My expectation is everything from rt2860-rt3090 at least will work. There are no changes to the other ral devices, but testers with other ral devices are probably necessary to be sure no regressions have occurred, especially with attach. Thanks! Matt