From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 20:22:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C547416A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 20:22:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.speakeasy.net (mail2.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8F243D49 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 20:22:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 12573 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2004 20:22:24 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Dec 2004 20:22:23 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D222944; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:22:22 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Zachary Huang References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 22 Dec 2004 15:22:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44oegmrsld.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unsuccessful upgrade from 4.2 to 4.10 through cvsup+make world X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 20:22:24 -0000 Zachary Huang writes: > the CVSUP must have worked since the directory /usr/home/ncvs has these files: > 325587 bytes: > > cyber# ls -l > -rw-r--r-- 1 root user 6355 Apr 30 2004 COPYRIGHT > -rw-r--r-- 1 root user 8480 Apr 16 2003 Makefile > -rw-r--r-- 1 root user 24190 May 25 2004 Makefile.inc1 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root user 9761 Aug 27 1999 Makefile.upgrade > -rw-r--r-- 1 root user 2699 Apr 26 2002 README > -rw-r--r-- 1 root user 44963 Dec 1 16:35 UPDATING > drwxr-xr-x 32 root user 512 Dec 21 20:32 bin > drwxr-xr-x 46 root user 1024 Dec 21 20:44 contrib > drwxr-xr-x 7 root user 512 Dec 21 20:48 crypto > drwxr-xr-x 14 root user 2048 Dec 21 20:48 etc > drwxr-xr-x 41 root user 1024 Dec 21 20:49 games > drwxr-xr-x 6 root user 512 Dec 21 20:51 gnu > drwxr-xr-x 6 root user 1536 Dec 21 20:51 include > drwxr-xr-x 7 root user 512 Dec 21 20:51 kerberos5 > drwxr-xr-x 8 root user 512 Dec 21 20:51 kerberosIV > drwxr-xr-x 57 root user 1536 Dec 21 20:54 lib > drwxr-xr-x 35 root user 1024 Dec 21 20:54 libexec > drwxr-xr-x 10 root user 512 Dec 21 20:55 release > drwxr-xr-x 82 root user 1536 Dec 21 20:55 sbin > drwxr-xr-x 6 root user 512 Dec 21 20:55 secure > drwxr-xr-x 23 root user 512 Dec 21 20:57 share > drwxr-xr-x 49 root user 1024 Dec 21 21:06 sys > drwxr-xr-x 8 root user 512 Dec 21 21:06 tools > drwxr-xr-x 221 root user 3584 Dec 21 21:08 usr.bin > drwxr-xr-x 157 root user 3072 Dec 21 21:10 usr.sbin > > so why were not the binary files updated? What did you actually do, what results did you expect, and what was the first place where the results you got were different?