From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 15 08:03:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA04852 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:03:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA04847; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:03:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id OAA28238; Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:04:04 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199810151304.OAA28238@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Trash Voxware? (was Re: rvplayer requires pcm for stable) To: conrads@neosoft.com Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:04:04 +0100 (MET) Cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Conrad Sabatier" at Oct 15, 98 08:33:48 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I really don't understand the eagerness to drop Voxware at this point in time. > Is it simply for the lack of maintainer? "simply" ? I am amazed, do people understand that the system is evolving so if a module works _now_ it does not mean it will work forever without mainteinance ? I really don't care if voxware stays or goes. At some point (maybe never...) it will happen to break because of changes in related parts of the system and then we will not have to decide. On the other hand people is not forced to upgrade, so even when a driver is removed they can happily stay with the last version that supported their favourite hardware. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message