From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 16:02:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBE31065673 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFED8FC1A for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAIG2WsC052983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:02:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4CE54E17.1040808@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:02:31 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gellekum References: <1289338625.11542.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <86y68qhjp7.fsf@siegel.tg.intern> <4CE52A6A.4070503@FreeBSD.org> <86tyjehbi7.fsf@siegel.tg.intern> In-Reply-To: <86tyjehbi7.fsf@siegel.tg.intern> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 195.250.144.108 Cc: glewis@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: eclipse-devel-3.6.1 failed on amd64 8] X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:02:34 -0000 On 2010/11/18 16:55, Thomas Gellekum wrote: > Pav Lucistnik writes: > >> On 2010/11/18 13:58, Thomas Gellekum wrote: >>> Looking at the error report again: >>> >>>>> PATCH_DEPENDS=apache-ant-1.7.1.tbz desktop-file-utils-0.15_2.tbz gamin-0.1.10_4.tbz gettext-0.18.1.1.tbz gio-fam-backend-2.24.2.tbz glib-2.24.2.tbz inputproto-2.0.tbz javavmwrapper-2.3.5.tbz jdk-1.6.0.3p4_19.tbz kbproto-1.0.4.tbz libX11-1.3.3_1,1.tbz libXau-1.0.5.tbz libXdmcp-1.0.3.tbz libXext-1.1.1,1.tbz libXi-1.3,1.tbz libXtst-1.1.0.tbz libiconv-1.13.1_1.tbz libpthread-stubs-0.3_3.tbz libxcb-1.7.tbz patch-2.6.1_1.tbz pcre-8.10.tbz perl-5.10.1_3.tbz pkg-config-0.25_1.tbz python26-2.6.6.tbz recordproto-1.14.tbz xextproto-7.1.1.tbz xproto-7.0.16.tbz zip-3.0.tbz >>> >>> This defines a dependency on jdk-1.6.0.3p4_19, whereas we explicitly >>> specify JAVA_VENDOR=openjdk in the makefile. Do we need to do anything >>> special to make the patch phase recognize the dependency correctly? Are >>> there just some definitions missing from bsd.java.mk? >> >> You don't have PATCH_DEPENDS on java in this port. The java you're >> looking at is dragged in via apache-ant. > > I see. Can someone please commit the attached patch? Committed. -- Pav Lucistnik