From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 07:16:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9395137B401 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from k6.locore.ca (k6.locore.ca [198.96.117.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D260A43FE5 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jake@k6.locore.ca) Received: from k6.locore.ca (localhost.locore.ca [127.0.0.1]) by k6.locore.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3LEIlxS052946 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:18:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jake@k6.locore.ca) Received: (from jake@localhost) by k6.locore.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h3LEIlYq052945 for alpha@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:18:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:18:47 -0400 From: Jake Burkholder To: alpha@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030421141847.GD50754@locore.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: ipfw(2) vs alpha X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:16:46 -0000 Is anyone using ipfw2 in -current on an alpha? It has all kinds of problems on sparc64 due to not respecting strict alignment constraints, which should affect alpha as well; things like ipfw list cause alignment faults with certain rule types. Anyone seeing this? Jake