Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:52:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280701] FreeBSD-SA-24:05 fix breaks ICMP/ICMP6 states handling in pf firewall (ping, traceroute) Message-ID: <bug-280701-7501-KbMwirAW2A@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-280701-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-280701-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280701 --- Comment #39 from Franco Fichtner <franco@opnsense.org> --- The evidence is the original SA patch series which spans hundreds of lines = of code changes and a lack of actual test coverage. The lack of benefit of dou= bt is strange in my opinion. I can revert only these patches and the problem disappears. Do you want to = know which exact commit is responsible? I can offer you this information. The further evidence is that pfctl -d fixes missing ND responses immediatel= y on affected systems. You wouldn't see these issues unless you used pf heavily coupled with IPv6 connectivity. These things are not prevalent in FreeBSD users, but they wi= ll certainly manifest in pfSense quite soon as well. I can see that with other patch submissions I have done over the past few weeks for FreeBSD 14.1 none= of which have been wilfully been looked at by the relevant authors of bugs in FreeBSD 14.0 and 14.1. I guess we can continue this hide and seek, but I wo= uld rather have it that we work together to fix issues within FreeBSD production releases together? Cheers, Franco --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280701-7501-KbMwirAW2A>