Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 01:08:55 +0900 (JST) From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: patch-config_office Message-ID: <200402141608.i1EG8tiA078987@sakura.ninth-nine.com> In-Reply-To: <20040214152312.GR3365@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040214152312.GR3365@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Feb 2004 10:23:12 -0500 Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> wrote: > statements that the part of patch-config_office that explicitly says > "use -lc_r on 5.X" is magically transformed to "use -lpthread on 5.X" > but only on one particular openoffice developer's machine. I don't know a statement for that patch. I think this is right. But, > I am frustrated because I haven't heard "you're wrong" or "you're right > but shut up for a while cuz we're busy;" I've only heard "I have no idea > what you're talking about." I know to stay unchanged. There is a problem in kernel scheduler which was reported by Taku YAMAMOTO <taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp> at current@FreeBSD.org. I confirmed this behavior and improvement by Taku's patch. So I made and have japanese/openoffice-1.1:-). > Please give me a head's up so I can stop wondering why I haven't heard > any response on a trivial and seemingly obvious fix. I'm not asking for > anything more than acknowledgement that I have not forgotten how to read > shell scripts. You're welcome to tell me to shit up and stop being a > PITA, but please give me something more than "patch-config_office > doesn't include -lc_r; that's just a weather balloon." I am not speaking as OOo maintainer, but I think this is "Not Objected by" case. From maho@ and daichi@ (and mbr@ indirectly), I heard that I(we?) give up why cannot compile, and have no idea.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402141608.i1EG8tiA078987>