Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri,  5 Oct 2012 12:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Ronald F.Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        rfg@tristatelogic.com
Subject:   docs/172369: mkisofs(8)/growisofs(1m) don't specify UDF version
Message-ID:  <20121005194232.2B96D50838@segfault.tristatelogic.com>
Resent-Message-ID: <201210051950.q95JoCaH000582@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         172369
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       mkisofs(8)/growisofs(1m) don't specify UDF version
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Oct 05 19:50:12 UTC 2012
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Ronald F. Guilmette
>Release:        FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64
>Organization:
entr0py
>Environment:

System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE

>Description:

Tha man pages for mkisofs(8) and growisofs(1m) fail to specify which version
of the UDF standard the generated output of these programs conforms to.

This is important because there are scurrilous rumors floating around the
Internet to the effect that FreeBSD does not support the most recect revisons
(2.50 & 2.60) of the UDF format standard.

It would be Nice to knoe if these rumors are true or not.

>How-To-Repeat:

man 8 mksiofs
man 1m growisofs

>Fix:

Document which version(s) of the UDF standard are supported/generated by
mkisofs and growisofs.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121005194232.2B96D50838>