Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:40:31 +0100
From:      Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile
Message-ID:  <CAHcdu2obVN38-8g1h-t687OLiH-GCDye6JEEgMQ7J78JaG4F3Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EE675FF.1090109@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201112111256.pBBCuIpY042748@repoman.freebsd.org> <4EE670E4.9040506@FreeBSD.org> <4EE67461.5000004@freebsd.org> <4EE675FF.1090109@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/12/12 Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>:
> On 12/12/2011 13:38, Rene Ladan wrote:
>> On 12-12-2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> Not only is this not necessary if you run xscreensaver already, it's
>>> probably a bad idea. At minimum, can you make this optional?
>>>
>> [cvs-lists omitted]
>>
>> I could make it optional if you insist, but if you do a fresh install
>> with xfce4-utils but without xlockmore you'll notice the dangling
>> invocation. =A0I don't see that xlockmore and xscreensaver conflict, so
>> why would it be a Bad Idea(TM) ?
>
> If we are going to install something by default, it should probably be
> xscreensaver. And yes, I'm biased because I maintain that port, but the
> client-server model of xscreensaver make it a better choice if actually
> keeping the screen locked is part of the goal. :)

I agree with you. In xinitrc file (line 185 up to 221) there're two
screensavers:
- xscreensaver
- gnome-screensaver

If you add xlockmore, you should add also "an entry" in xinitrc file (I thi=
nk).

>
> Given that the thing has existed to date just fine with no dependency to
> fulfill the "dangling invocation" can I suggest adding xscreensaver as
> an optional dependency, or if people feel strongly about offering
> xlockmore to offer them both, with the requisite logic to prevent
> installing both? Bonus points if we can detect that one of them is
> already installed. :)
>
>
> Doug
>
>>> On 12/11/2011 04:56, Rene Ladan wrote:
>>>> rene =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02011-12-11 12:56:18 UTC
>>>>
>>>> =A0 FreeBSD ports repository
>>>>
>>>> =A0 Modified files:
>>>> =A0 =A0 sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile
>>>> =A0 Log:
>>>> =A0 - Add a runtime dependency on x11/xlockmore so that xflock4 can in=
voke xlock.
>>>> =A0 - Bump PORTREVISION
>>>>
>>>> =A0 Feature safe: =A0 yes
>>>>
>>>> =A0 Revision =A0Changes =A0 =A0Path
>>>> =A0 1.58 =A0 =A0 =A0+3 -0 =A0 =A0 =A0ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/Makefi=
le
>>>>
>>>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/Makef=
ile.diff?&r1=3D1.57&r2=3D1.58&f=3Dh
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0[^L]
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DN=
S.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Yours for the right price. =A0:) =A0http://SupersetSolutio=
ns.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



--=20
olivier



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHcdu2obVN38-8g1h-t687OLiH-GCDye6JEEgMQ7J78JaG4F3Q>