From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 18 11:39:11 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB6337B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc11.attbi.com (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB1443F93
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[24.147.188.198])
          by attbi.com (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <2003061818391001300ng8dbe>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:39:10 +0000
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198]
	(may be forged))
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h5IId91V006384
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:39:09 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: (from lowell@localhost)
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h5IId870006381;
	Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:39:08 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to
	freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f
Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <00c101c3353c$4ecbe100$0100a8c0@ibacsoft.dynu.com>
	<87of0wjfc5.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
	<00da01c33542$bc6a42a0$0100a8c0@ibacsoft.dynu.com>
	<44d6hchzkq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
	<00e301c33544$9d4503e0$0100a8c0@ibacsoft.dynu.com>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
Date: 18 Jun 2003 14:39:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <00e301c33544$9d4503e0$0100a8c0@ibacsoft.dynu.com>
Message-ID: <44r85r8c37.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 6
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: Two DNS servers with one IP address
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:39:11 -0000

Alfonso Romero <ibac@prodigy.net.mx> writes:

> you mean each nameserver must have its own unique IP?
        
Yes.  Otherwise there wouldn't be any redundancy.  That's why you need
two nameservers in the first place.