From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 10:26:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13A416A4D0; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:26:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7961443D58; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:25:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from phantom.cris.net (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i08IPsl7035013; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:25:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i08IPspm035008; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:25:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:25:54 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "Brian F. Feldman" Message-ID: <20040108182554.GC33759@FreeBSD.org.ua> References: <20040108175746.GB33759@FreeBSD.org.ua> <200401081804.i08I4EPB012056@green.bikeshed.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qjNfmADvan18RZcF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401081804.i08I4EPB012056@green.bikeshed.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.obj.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:26:01 -0000 --qjNfmADvan18RZcF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:04:14PM -0500, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:07:32PM -0500, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > > I don't see the bsd.obj.mk change as being anything but slightly more= =20 > > > correct, so I wouldn't see a good reason to remove it either way. I'= m glad=20 > > > we've clarified the issue. > > >=20 > > I never said I want the commit to be backed out, did I? ;) > > I even see it as a slight improvement, but for a reason that > > is different from what is in the commit log -- it saves one > > make(1) invocation. I think that a null commit would be in > > order though. >=20 > I'm not sure how I missed seeing .MAKEFLAGS -- I just went with what most= ly=20 > worked due to POLA ;-) Thanks, ru; would you like to do the null commit= =20 > clarification, or shall I? >=20 You do please. ;) --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --qjNfmADvan18RZcF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//aCyUkv4P6juNwoRAjcjAJ9H4cuDzuMbelfv2EgbSG1URbDb+QCeOTYp hv92gTeqYGwo7EoF/vRQnx8= =MNta -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qjNfmADvan18RZcF--