Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:30:01 +0200 From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> To: "Mikle Krutov" <nekoexmachina@gmail.com>, freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: More stable and reliable NTFS driver for read-only access? Message-ID: <op.vfhhkbuv8527sy@212-123-145-58.ip.telfort.nl> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimxlLCBKAcfyYiRyE-lJDjuz5nQ-6LWxjHArZXY@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimxlLCBKAcfyYiRyE-lJDjuz5nQ-6LWxjHArZXY@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:24:19 +0200, Mikle Krutov <nekoexmachina@gmail.com> wrote: > Which ntfs driver is more reliable, stable > and fast for read-only access, ntfs-3g or > kernel one? > Never ever had a contact with ntfs on > fbsd, and friend of mine asks to backup > his data to my machine (from ntfs hdd, > formated in vista, if it makes any > difference) > I used the kernel one with FreeBSD 7 to backup a NTFS partition. I wouldn't know why it wouldn't work in FreeBSD 8. Why don't you just try it? Ronald.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.vfhhkbuv8527sy>