From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 17:12:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170BF106566C; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from smtpfb2-g21.free.fr (smtpfb2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFB98FC0A; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5]) by smtpfb2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF12D1A310; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:53:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from graf.pompo.net (unknown [78.225.128.39]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4573D481FD; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:53:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C88F0114B8; Tue, 10 May 2011 18:48:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:48:27 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Message-ID: <20110510164827.GC49595@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , ports@FreeBSD.org, koziol@hdfgroup.org, "maho@FreeBSD.org" References: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, koziol@hdfgroup.org, "maho@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Why so many versions of the port science/hdf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:12:12 -0000 --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mar 10 mai 11 =E0 15:05:02 +0200, Stephen Montgomery-Smith =E9crivait=A0: > If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. (I= =20 > currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.) >=20 > Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18? I already switched several ports from hdf5 to hdf5-18 (see PR ports/154736). It seems that it would be possible to replace hdf5-18 by hdf5 everywhere, but some ports would require to define H5_USE_16_API. Best regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk3JbFsACgkQc95pjMcUBaLFxgCePfF/LBb5rqfQyKjAE+NnwlKx iokAn2XKzcLPDcR/WCI6bIKV1szBGI3w =NFEy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--