Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:48:27 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, koziol@hdfgroup.org, "maho@FreeBSD.org" <maho@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Why so many versions of the port science/hdf? Message-ID: <20110510164827.GC49595@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu> References: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mar 10 mai 11 =E0 15:05:02 +0200, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@miss= ouri.edu> =E9crivait=A0: > If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. (I= =20 > currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.) >=20 > Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18? I already switched several ports from hdf5 to hdf5-18 (see PR ports/154736). It seems that it would be possible to replace hdf5-18 by hdf5 everywhere, but some ports would require to define H5_USE_16_API. Best regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk3JbFsACgkQc95pjMcUBaLFxgCePfF/LBb5rqfQyKjAE+NnwlKx iokAn2XKzcLPDcR/WCI6bIKV1szBGI3w =NFEy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110510164827.GC49595>