From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 19 09:26:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA23988 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:26:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA23979 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:26:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16775; Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:25:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:25:21 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Gary Schrock cc: miker@scifair.acadiau.ca, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Backing up via rdump using ssh In-Reply-To: <4.1.19981118151933.00a38a00@eyelab.msu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Gary Schrock wrote: > Just to add something here, another thing to do is to try some of the other > encryption methods. The default one is pretty slow, so slow machines don't > do well with it (I couldn't get the tape drive to stream at all when using > it on the 486dx/66 that the machine used to be). However, some of the > other encryptions that ssh offers are faster, and thus would at least let > you use *some* form of encryption. I ended up using blowfish because it > was fast enough that our slow machine was still able to send data fast > enough to stream the drive. > Our slow machine is a 486/25sx with IDE disks; the tape drive is on a P120 with SCSI-2. Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message