Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:31:13 -0700
From:      Dana Myers <dana.myers@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Spurious thermal shutdowns on Dell Studio 1557
Message-ID:  <4BB8BED1.1090004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BB8B603.60902@chillt.de>
References:  <4BB69279.6060005@chillt.de>		<20100403152134.V35463@sola.nimnet.asn.au>	<4BB74BC4.9070409@chillt.de>		<20100404012906.I35463@sola.nimnet.asn.au>		<1270308642.1455.10.camel@RabbitsDen> <4BB764CC.60500@chillt.de>		<1270334546.1455.45.camel@RabbitsDen> <4BB7C937.9050106@chillt.de>		<1270337076.1455.60.camel@RabbitsDen> <4BB7D71C.7080303@chillt.de>	<1270341153.1455.81.camel@RabbitsDen> <4BB8B603.60902@chillt.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/4/2010 8:53 AM, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
>
>> Theoretically, your laptop should be able to run with CPU stuck at
>> its highest frequency without shutting down.
>
> I agree. This is precisely what I am trying to achieve.

[Coming into this thread late]

Why do you think that's true?  While this is desirable, it's
certainly possible that the machine was built with a thermal
design that is unable to achieve this, and depends on
software to reduce CPU P-state to avoid shut-down.

One example I've seen is the Acer Ferrari 3400, which would
run the CPU at P0 (full clock rate) by default, but after a
few minutes of aggressive use (like, building a kernel), would
drop the highest CPU state to P1 (10% slower) via a GPE.  This
notebook simply can't run the CPU at a full clock rate load
for more than a few minutes before it overheats, apparently
by design.

Thermal design in notebooks seems to be quite tricky.

Dana




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BB8BED1.1090004>