From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 3 06:50:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E69116A612; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 06:50:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk.360sip.com [72.236.70.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A88343D5E; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 06:50:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.47] (S0106001372fd1e07.vs.shawcable.net [70.71.9.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA36oXGm026632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:50:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <454AE6B2.70702@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:50:26 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vd@FreeBSD.org References: <200611030351.kA33peWQ061783@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061103061317.GB64699@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454ADF4A.5080201@FreeBSD.org> <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mpatrol Makefile ports/devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:50:36 -0000 Vasil Dimov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:18:50PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Vasil Dimov wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:51:40AM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>>> sobomax 2006-11-03 03:51:40 UTC >>> [...] >>>> Added files: >>>> devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c >>> Aargh :-/ >>> I thought we were supposed to use Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl for new >>> patches. >> Why so? We have Tools/scripts/patchtool.py for the few years now. > > The note I made was about the convention, not the exact tool used. You > should read: > > "I thought we were supposed to use the convention used by > Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl for new patches." Who those "we" are and why exactly they should use that "convention"? Is it official or what? -Maxim