From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 23:43:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1127B16A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:43:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net (mtaw4.prodigy.net [64.164.98.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57AA43D5A; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:43:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (f904085986da8878ab0572337f949fe1@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203]) by mtaw4.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2P7hpfG007550; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:43:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ABCA551CAD; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:43:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:43:51 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ernst de Haan Message-ID: <20040325074351.GA63609@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040324194155.GA53330@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040324205331.GA6028@phantom.cris.net> <20040324230327.GA56450@xor.obsecurity.org> <200403250820.15128.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403250820.15128.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: java@FreeBSD.org cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org cc: Alexey Zelkin cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Openoffice-1.1 depends on 5 different jdks X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:43:56 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:20:15AM +0100, Ernst de Haan wrote: > Kris, >=20 > > This does hilight the bsd.java.mk problem that old versions of the jdk > > are used by default by the USE_JAVA=3D1.2+ construction, which defaults > > to the oldest possible jdk (1.2) instead of the newest stable version. >=20 > When newer JDK's become more stable than the old ones _and_ have not too= =20 > many dependencies, then the newer JDK's are moved up the preference list. Isn't at least 1.3 considered "stable"? 1.2 is unbuildable as a package because it eventually depends on the FORBIDDEN compat3x. Kris --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAYo23Wry0BWjoQKURAsWCAKCBDnEHgyv8EOoprhrGF+3ldNzFMgCg6Tfa WkmVT02DadMXnoqM827elOM= =bf+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--