From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 25 03:00:19 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6989A685
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 03:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1329032F2
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 03:00:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7P30HtB026697
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:00:17 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost)
 by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s7P30Hfw026694;
 Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:00:17 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:00:17 -0600 (MDT)
From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Subject: Re: some ZFS questions
In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y71U1CnU=iCdNf902YiLzaJ4TtpZMwpjN6xms_Xuwsbu9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1408242059290.2348@wonkity.com>
References: <201408070816.s778G9ug015988@sdf.org>
 <40AF5B49-80AF-4FE2-BA14-BFF86164EAA8@kraus-haus.org>
 <201408211007.s7LA7YGd002430@sdf.org>
 <E32981BF-613C-49D9-B7F8-18B9A99C0141@kraus-haus.org>
 <201408241015.s7OAFRv7010196@sdf.org>
 <20140825014249.GA28995@neutralgood.org>
 <CAHu1Y71U1CnU=iCdNf902YiLzaJ4TtpZMwpjN6xms_Xuwsbu9Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:00:17 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 03:00:19 -0000

On Sun, 24 Aug 2014, Michael Sierchio wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 6:42 PM,  <kpneal@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
>> If you can use GPT partitioning then you can have GPT labels on partitions
>> spanning entire disks. Then you can rearrange physical disks to your hearts
>> content.
>>
>> The bonus is that you can put identifying information in the label name
>> to be even more sure you are replacing the correct disk when the time
>> comes.
>
> You can do this - and it's the approach that FreeNAS takes, but you
> lose the benefits of presenting a whole disk to ZFS - the ability to
> fully use the disk cache when presented a raw device rather than a
> partition.

I thought that was a Solaris-only limitation.  In fact, I'm pretty sure 
it is, and does not apply on FreeBSD.