From owner-freebsd-fs Fri Jan 18 14: 7:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mail.allcaps.org (mail.allcaps.org [208.252.245.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B845137B404; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:07:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 795463261E; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:07:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C0D2E821; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:07:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:07:52 -0800 (PST) From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski" To: Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" , , Subject: Re: Two RAID questions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020118140049.A87081-100000@mail.allcaps.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I looked at the CVS repository today and didn't note a tag on the fsck code for -STABLE. Is background fsck'ing included in -STABLE? The large fsck times for multi-GB and TB RAID servers is becoming an impediment to using FreeBSD as a server (where BSD has traditionally been strong). If it's not included, what are the issues preventing it from getting folded backward? Andy L. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message