From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jul 2 11:55:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA17867 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 11:55:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rheingold.reed.edu (wcooley@c029h021.ipdorm.reed.edu [134.10.29.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA17747 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 11:54:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wcooley@nakedape.ml.org) Received: from localhost (wcooley@localhost) by rheingold.reed.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA12729 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 11:54:28 -0700 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 11:54:28 -0700 (PDT) From: "W. Reilly Cooley, Esq." X-Sender: wcooley@rheingold To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: CUCIPOP? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've read a couple of messages in other lists recommending CUCIPOP in light of the recent exploits of QPOPPER. Has anyone tried this? What are you opinions? One thing obviously irritating about QPOPPER is the difficultly in transferring large attachments. Wil -- W. Reilly Cooley Linux 2.0.34 Naked Ape Consulting FreeBSD 2.2.6 wcooley@nakedape.ml.org NetBSD/sun3 1.3.2 http://www.nakedape.ml.org NetBSD/pmax 1.3.2 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message