From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug  9 06:34:48 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF84106566B;
	Thu,  9 Aug 2012 06:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FD814DA49;
	Thu,  9 Aug 2012 06:34:47 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <50235A07.8010606@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:34:47 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201208090545.q795jEAS072648@svn.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201208090545.q795jEAS072648@svn.freebsd.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r302327 - head/games/glightoff
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
	<svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>, 
	<mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 06:34:48 -0000

On 08/08/2012 10:45 PM, Jason Helfman wrote:
>    - bump not necessary as other dependencies require pkgconf within existing
>      attribute

I'm not sure what this means, but does this particular thing require
pkgconf to configure/build? If so, can you please add a USE_PKGCONFIG=
build?

Reason being that as we remove the bogus run-dep on pkgconf, and as
people start to rely more on packages, it will become more common for
people to install a system that doesn't already have pkgconf, and then
potentially want to update this one thing via the ports. So if it needs
pkgconf to build, it should have that as a build dep.

Doug