From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 29 21:03:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C39A16A4CE; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:03:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from gauss.stokely.org (builder.freebsdmall.com [65.86.180.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F03043FA3; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:03:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@gauss.stokely.org) Received: from gauss.stokely.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gauss.stokely.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9U53wYm048464; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:03:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@gauss.stokely.org) Received: (from murray@localhost) by gauss.stokely.org (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h9U53wsv048463; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:03:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:03:58 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: Hideyuki KURASHINA Message-ID: <20031030050358.GF48267@freebsdmall.com> References: <200310292232.h9TMWOJe061655@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310292232.h9TMWOJe061655@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-doc@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases index.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 05:03:59 -0000 On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 02:32:24PM -0800, Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote: > Log: > Add FreeBSD 4.9 to the past releases list. Personally, I think both 5.1 and 4.9 should not be in the past releases section, and that's why I didn't add it there. The page is broken up into 'Current Releases', 'Future Releases', and 'Past Releases'. We never used to list them twice in current and past until 5.1. I think that was just a mistake, and there's no need to duplicate it for 4.9. Not a big deal either way. Just my thoughts. - Murray