From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 13 09:16:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16A6AE19; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pacha.mail.dyslexicfish.net (space.mail.dyslexicfish.net [91.109.5.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A541F1BF4; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from catnip.dyslexicfish.net (space.mail.dyslexicfish.net [91.109.5.35]) by pacha.mail.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1D9GH6j037710; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:16:18 GMT (envelope-from jamie@catnip.dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by catnip.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id s1D9GFsN037708; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:16:15 GMT (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <201402130916.s1D9GFsN037708@catnip.dyslexicfish.net> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:16:13 +0000 To: jamie@dyslexicfish.net, bjk@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/186608: typo in 'ctime(3) man page References: <201402090702.s1972G1s067725@catnip.dyslexicfish.net> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (pacha.mail.dyslexicfish.net [91.109.5.35]); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:16:19 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:16:30 -0000 Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > I think that the current ~upstream for the tzcode is supposed to be > https://github.com/eggert/tz/ , but I haven't checked particularly > recently. (There was some excitement involving a legal action, etc., so > it had gone away and/or moved.) That said, I don't see a BUGS section at > all in the newctime.3 in that repo, and I also don't see the erroneous > line you quote in the history of that repo, so ... I'm not sure what > happened. Ahh. OK! Thanks. > > I hope I don't get the reputation for most anal contributor :-( > > Definitely not! ha! You haven't seen my other PR's :-) > PR is fine, it gives us a place to look when we need to find things. ok, thanks. > Thanks for pointing it out. I'll try to think about what the best route > to a fix is. no rush. hee hee. p.s. my next PRs (2 pending) are 'proper' bug fixes! cheers, Jamie