From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 17 03:02:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC2AE1DCC4 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 03:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1796EF49 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 03:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 21so13212740iof.6 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:02:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LCDl+MkAO3D9jwB0N5sTwErNzWB+w71MOn3m3hgAw24=; b=YRXbXbVtr9/5083X8TyBsik0o0EnJ6Pk1mRXgmlY778AJbQGgBy1wAcn53XFm3i4m/ uuvU3s3uY2dfUImbj0LxN/ge/ZhGdkiSViqiZB/PURPqrF+HgKe2dkUkwlKxY59o6nhG QCbh8GTMI+SBMnCCHzTIlYpE/jXq5nI1DIv/05xTKT850SuXNtSVhuUwM4MLm+ttYfHK 9v6SrcNAW0ZoE41v1IduQXO+/aOx+14MUlRuPyBkCkYT2meqlQxYpuwj8bxUYOMD9te1 zPoBVU2/nFAfHzQr8t+D2KY1yDwV72ttdnywywKtCLu8C3C8YvdCG0FqoX2ClfKBoadd RoLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LCDl+MkAO3D9jwB0N5sTwErNzWB+w71MOn3m3hgAw24=; b=TLNZyfqp2FSN+ZIWxUM5GHzBbgfWHCYS5wnmHkInNFZ3hVEW8CnIb80nJ704OuV7mX pe5oTqd1iWuPZwFksH7HY48BTKPqasKIEpJzYqj9fuVgGacJjWIhit4L3ve6I71e7rWK 9NELcK2b0pu5MRlEUqBuTaD5pl8nSFs2PSZsIBA68bV6jS3vT11R55JNMlswrOqDB1c6 jOqLhsFAZUvfZKimIX7XVx548E1Bq/o1VQuIKI4IT1Ll211vvuwMDvvlS59qHhCgQWhP QAOV0YOvrNGpshGG3OentNyKYiIiTpDoCXSrJt6/r+vmj9YYpd3k017t6sZcwQmgKgaP NZEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUio7/2B8NoG61+gXiFMkZrZ1n9qco6F0qIdNmI4iEo+/a2KkxMV ik5qGshjf85BufrV/JV/Ik9B6X3uDJ/KgwmZfk2OmQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBFOsydjBi5dmt4VXbBUdB3vtkKKSt/JJMSw9Pz1n6OfE4FbSDfY77w6uolyLeMVriIL9jhwSTFW+ao2WRdxHI= X-Received: by 10.107.183.213 with SMTP id h204mr15981630iof.61.1505617350838; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:02:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.145.141 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:02:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Adam Vande More Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 22:02:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Future of SAMBA on FreeBSD To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 03:02:31 -0000 On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:19 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Sat, September 16, 2017 19:49, Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:02 AM, James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions > > < freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Are you trying this in a jail? Did you read the relevant UPDATING > > entry? > > > > 1. No, this is not being attempted in a jail. > > 2. Yes, but this is not an update of an existing samba DC but a new > installation. The pkg built on FreeBSD-11 but it will not provision > as a DC. > > The issue is tied to the implementation of extended attributes which > somehow differs under FreeBSD from Linux. My question was directed at > the FreeBSD maintainers since the package maintainer is constrained by > the limits enforced by the operating system.A work around that is > reported to work is to patch Damba 4.6 to use the default namespace > which approach the Samba team deprecate as being insecure. > The bug you linked to has nothing to do with the issue of trying to provision a DC on a non-jailed FreeBSD installation. Google tells me you already have the answer as to why this particular issue doesn't work. http://lists-archives.com/samba/106557-freebsd-11-and-samba-4-6-as-a-dc.html Is there some critical reason you can't simply use 4.5 until this is resolved? Or use an OS that supports this? -- Adam