From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Sep 29 7:24:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from bsdie.rwsystems.net (bsdie.rwsystems.net [209.197.223.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6270437B422; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bsdie.rwsystems.net([209.197.223.2]) (2397 bytes) by bsdie.rwsystems.net via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:05:12 -0500 (CDT) (Smail-3.2.0.111 2000-Feb-17 #1 built 2000-Jun-25) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:05:12 -0500 (CDT) From: James Wyatt To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: John Turner , Andy Wolf , Jan Knepper , Jim Weeks Subject: RE: DNS: having domain1.com and domain1.net point to the same IP. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Jim Weeks wrote: > Subject: RE: DNS: having domain1.com and domain1.net point to the same IP. > On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, John Turner wrote: > > At 08:24 AM 9/29/2000 -0400, Jim Weeks wrote: > > >The general consensus throughout the industry seems to be that C names are > > >evil. > > > > I've never heard this. CNAME records have a very specific use, when used > > that way they work great. CNAME records are for roles, not hosts. If I > > had to use A records for all of my DNS records, it would take hours of > > management per week. Once I have A records in place, I use CNAMEs, this > > makes changes very easy. > > > > >I have never been bitten by just using A names. > > > > True, to a point. Get hundreds of A records, and you'll get bit by not > > having enough time in the day to keep everything straight. > > I'm not sure I understand how adding an A record is any more time > consuming than adding a C record. How are they harder to keep strait? I > may be doing unnecessary work. Must not have to renumber things very often is my guess... If there are multiple 'CNAME's pointing to an 'A', then you only have *one* address to renumber and percolate through the planetary DNSs. I host various functions for several domains and 'CNAME's have been my friend. I try not to use 'MX's point to 'CNAME's, however, as that *has* caused problems. I am *amazed* at the number of MTAs that try 'A's even though 'MX's exist. 'CNAME's are not inherently evil in themselves, but some are misused - Jy@ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message