From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jan  5 15:42:12 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA11417
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 15:42:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA11411
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 15:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA10949; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 15:42:04 -0800
To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Current is looking more stable these days..? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Jan 1996 15:20:11 PST."
             <199601052320.PAA09849@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 1996 15:42:03 -0800
Message-ID: <10947.820885323@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I'd like to see a 2.1-SNAP first.  We've had quite a few bug
> fixes since 2.1-Release.

Hmmm.  I just looked through the 206K or so of diffs between
RELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE and the RELENG_2_1_0 HEAD and I don't see
anything there that would really merit a 2.1 SNAP though..
At least certainly not for awhile yet.

						Jordan