From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 10 1:54: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from icon.bg (icon.bg [62.176.80.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFCD037B422 for ; Thu, 10 May 2001 01:54:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from v0rbiz@icon.bg) Received: (qmail 45861 invoked by uid 1144); 10 May 2001 08:59:31 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 11:59:31 +0300 From: Victor Ivanov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: stupid question about ata-raid Message-ID: <20010510115931.A45195@icon.icon.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have here an ATA RAID (HPT370) RAID-1 array. Everything is OK, but I think there is no point of using the RAID for the swap. The write access is slower, and noone actualy needs to back up a swap partition. The question is, can I use directly ad4s1b and ad5s1b for two swap entr= ies in /etc/fstab instead of ar0s1b? Will it work as I expect it to work? Thanks, and please cc me when replying, I'm not on the list. --=20 Players win and winners play Have a lucky day --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.1i iQCVAwUBOvpYcPD9M5lef5W3AQEilQQAhih/H6ZKeigT70uEmT8VGhU7KwrcxCjm I81KG7Wgdxv3GiYWKfw/l0PhAyMsp8ebdzXVYIYWQlR23tGjcMJIMhHR3txRfOIY ykcKbHXTrY6BNbFJPs6JbgAm+I01GKurC8RvNyGLAAmUiONVXIJWE5uTNSKwXa+j EcfRQpmOKYI= =X9Iz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message