From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 05:34:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D776CC1FB8B for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dreamx@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D97BAFB for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dreamx@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([109.100.29.30]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGBdv-1cAvy31IKV-00F99I for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:34:32 +0200 Subject: Re: Jive prejudices To: FreeBSD ports References: <201610240022.u9O0MBV2092153@fire.js.berklix.net> From: Horatiu Moldovan Message-ID: <9cb5785d-2932-d52d-12f5-f0191a12f4a4@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:33:59 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201610240022.u9O0MBV2092153@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mhqhzaZGfr804qJAGQgcoydPO6P9x1lFWRFvhui3cTaAG4nMVRR zVw8UF1FBFrSOZQDWJAfRWm3Lj7fgRleL/UlXr8I9eZZYLUct38RHzfAtMVBWaf/jid/u5d MRO+J4IZc4poEZ9R5MaER05SxR+h9GbxWHd7WmKYHR1VawnJz9e02rk1x3T6sxQD/0rguLA 12LK1t/yd/K3pyt2z7mzA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:lmeOPkpl8u8=:SI7hCQeGfiBf+wvkDp9507 rWraSrNVjtl+2COaOPCKuzjEJ0hXlaZEz21TqcVYWKTDWd5DjNPbi+xeZsUwRkOVdCCE8qBug XbunB7axf+WxdRFLTapXBI8RoUParEuZmUUhqmWY+00X0Ihkc6V0vxhnOEb38MVgTtcWRYF3I hCPIywMXZKKEGj/L6PjqWHiVd0jTEeNJH+X58p9C7fMwfGHSul7p7t6i706mzST/LXIR08FD2 0azi24vf3PjPXT5HKu4miE1JGlJTF9yu2T7Na0V4U/uHPY08v0XYOPlIPWoWqUTB6vYdmWd6B 8IIcOnSfoxP9JygBZNwJqXD7VNcljNimEm7ncCKCLRhTnHOlyBXCO8Rd5GY2DJfR6LrTJp5Gv gHXS5yyKmkXt8HYHmn2IEUcALbIEviwwVzjfWOykYa1hYZeJmwwNnMpFZKuYZojha3hRLSqoP SWq1nbmvBqBvUOKCccabAAtCZjZ013SDu776bujhx2zVUNEzcvZ3qSFbPl8vIxHVPENrF+GIh iqxjui5gRfQBAy3yoFH7+zRUMF1fzB0halWD3JWrU6TGR/LaRQlaijLI10BuiOopMpW0p9f6H qlHOSWXebXqnu3m5jbHRBCDQgT0TX6zYYHrh7mwmffVWqa9p4HhDm2kfPegD+uMqEYtdbzrx/ neBm7WSoudHm2onbxMs0fHs+ECSIYh5Q1aew63tN2hm6ZzPJe3vP/MfsGbsaWvZUrnEVFIoZq s8O2dbWvxi/7ve5OL9heCggouIZlgo3b+hRLoFBWkWWnDI9WNjxLpu8w44jFgAYiz8CIbUYo0 5Ipi2Qr X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:34:41 -0000 On 24/10/2016 03:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > scratch65535@att.net wrote: >> For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially >> deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up >> that there's potentially something unsavory about it. > Snap ! Seconded :-) > > Same as my Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:05:52 +0200 > SENSITIVE= > but datestamps show you thought of it first :-) > > Cheers, > Julian > -- > Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich > Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. > http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Maybe off-topic, but I can't help wondering if we're close to the point when a port should be removed because someone finds a variable/type name "offensive". Am I being paranoid? Let's wait and see. --- H.