Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:33:59 +0300 From: Horatiu Moldovan <dreamx@gmx.de> To: FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Jive prejudices Message-ID: <9cb5785d-2932-d52d-12f5-f0191a12f4a4@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <201610240022.u9O0MBV2092153@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201610240022.u9O0MBV2092153@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24/10/2016 03:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > scratch65535@att.net wrote: >> For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially >> deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up >> that there's potentially something unsavory about it. > Snap ! Seconded :-) > > Same as my Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:05:52 +0200 > SENSITIVE= > but datestamps show you thought of it first :-) > > Cheers, > Julian > -- > Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich > Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. > http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Maybe off-topic, but I can't help wondering if we're close to the point when a port should be removed because someone finds a variable/type name "offensive". Am I being paranoid? Let's wait and see. --- H.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9cb5785d-2932-d52d-12f5-f0191a12f4a4>